 |
Dig
deeper into the discussion (or go back) |
 |
|
|
Forward this post to a friend!
|
|
|
Pedophiles on internet radio.
|
Should pedophiles be allowed to have a platform where they can speak their minds? They are doing just that. Internet radio station Sure Quality Radio is interviewing pedophiles on the air as I type this. listen in and decide for yourself. Copy this URL into winamp to connect and listen to Sure Quality Radio. 69.9.32.186:9748
|
Verdict:
1.00.
crampon (1.00)
|
USA
|
6/26/2005 9:05:37 PM
|
|
|
Pedophiles on internet radio.
|
Should pedophiles be allowed to have a platform where they can speak their minds? I don't see why not. Either you support free speech for all, or for no one. It would currently be illegal to deny them their right to free speech. But judging by the way mass hysteria is steering the decisions of lawmakers, I wouldn’t be surprised if pedophiles (note, not just child molesters) are soon denied this freedom also.
I found the content on this station extremely interesting. If anyone has an interest in the most extreme controversy and ethical paradoxes then I recommend listening in to this station.
P.S. Whether you are using the technical psychological definition or the definition most dictionaries contain, the word “pedophile” usually equates incorrectly to “child molester” in the minds of the vast majority. It’s more accurate and appropriate to classify the main target audience of Sure Quality Radio as boylovers. Re www.surequalityradio.org esp. http://surequalityradio.org/mission%20statement.htm
|
Verdict:
10.00.
Log in to rate
Scottie (10.00)
|
UK
|
7/14/2005 7:25:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Pedophiles on internet radio.
|
Scottie, we have discussed this together many, many times. I'd say the listener group for any 'specialty' radio station is an amalgam of all types. We don't objectively know the sexual practices of the listeners. It's likely a bunch of bls, some kfs, and a handful of people who are just nosy, or FBI agents, or whatever.
For the unitiated, bls are boylovers, mostly not sexually active with underage males, always see sex as secondary to consensual love; kfs, excuse my crass language, are kiddie fuckers, or what we'd classify as molesters. The broad term, paedophile, is hardly useful. By that definition, all caring teachers who teach males are bls, ergo, paedophiles, which is utter nonsense. This is a catch-word now, as part of a social terror campaign that catches up every assumed asocietal tendency, to further intimidate the population. There are very bad dudes out there. Here, we see kids being raped, murdered, sexually and psychologically abused. Would be classify the monsters who do that as 'boylovers'?
I prefer to think of you, dear friend, as Scottie, likely the sweetest and most caring person in the world. Damn cute, too. I'd trust you with my grandsons, which is a huge statemenbt for me.
All my love, Ian (all round person-lover)
|
Verdict:
still out.
Log in to rate
gonzub (unrated)
|
Canada
|
7/14/2005 9:55:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's this all about?
GAZM.org is founded on the principle that expression assures one's sense of self, advances knowledge and determines truth. GAZM users encourage each other's expression by engaging the heart, exciting the mind and stimulating the soul with constant streams of provocative thoughts, opinions, ideas and art. Do not be intimidated to join (for free), post often and seduce others to do the same.
Random Uploads: (rating)
|
(9.50)
|
|
(6.88)
|
|
(5.75)
|
|
(6.33)
|
|
(7.00)
|
Top Uploads: (size, rating)
|
*love.jpg
(281.66kb,
9.70)
|
|
*fetishes.gif
(196.21kb,
9.70)
|
|
*southstreet.jpg
(161.65kb,
9.50)
|
|
*channelingsound2.jpg
(80.87kb,
9.50)
|
|
*crazy[1].wav
(37.85kb,
9.25)
|
|
*nocturnal.jpg
(88.61kb,
9.00)
|
|
*intro.doc
(41.00kb,
9.00)
|
|
*krstark.jpg
(15.58kb,
9.00)
|
|
*bluehunger.jpg
(99.77kb,
8.83)
|
|
*ek_1.jpg
(273.01kb,
8.83)
|
Siteseeing: (suggest)
Fazed
BBspot
Karber
Monoki
Banneshee
Stick Suicide
Big Blue Blog
Project Monkey
Jacob Shwirtz - The Journal
|
|
|
|
|